Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill
Liam McArthur’s Private Members Bill on Assisted Dying was published/introduced to parliament on 28th March 2024. A link can be found here: Introduced | Scottish Parliament Website.
The decision my party, the Scottish Conservatives, has taken on this bill is to allow a free vote when this is voted upon in the chamber for the Stage 1 debate. However, there is not yet an agreed timeline for when this legislation will be brought in front of parliament. I have thought long and hard about this and have decided that I am unable to support this private members bill. I met Liam McArthur MSP to discuss my concerns and he is aware of them. If you want to learn more about my position on this bill then please read this article which is published on my website: Pressure prompts second thoughts on assisted dying | Sue Webber
I have been heartened that my colleague Miles Briggs MSP is seeking to introduce another private members bill that seeks to make legal the Right to Palliative Care. Right now, 1 in 4 people are not getting access to palliative care in Scotland, and this bill would give people of all ages living with terminal illness and residing in Scotland a legal right to palliative care. The consultation on this Bill has opened and I will be supporting this Bill as it hopefully proceeds through parliament. If you wish to contribute to the consultation a link can be found here: Miles Briggs - Right to Palliative Care (Scotland) Bill Consultation Document (parliament.scot)
Prostitution (Offences and Support)(Scotland) Bill - The unbuyable bill
This proposed legislation could be an important step towards addressing commercial sexual exploitation in Scotland.
The main points of the bill are; to criminalise the purchase of sex, to decriminalise those selling sexual services, repealing outdated offences that target vulnerable individuals, and to create a statutory right to support for exiting prostitution and help in moving to safer, more sustainable livelihoods.
At this stage in the legislative process I am supporting the Bill in order to advance the cause of human dignity and sex equality.
Scottish Government Winter Fuel Payment
The SNP Government recently announced that all pensioners in Scotland will receive a winter fuel payment in 2025/26. Under the plans, those in receipt of pension credit or other benefits will receive a £200 or £300 payment, depending on their age. All other pensioners will receive a reduced payment of £100.
The SNP have been trying to hoodwink people into believing they are on their side when they haven’t delivered the support they need. Despite trying to talk up this decision to pensioners, the reality is that this new payment will be a cut for many pensioners and it won’t be coming this winter.
It should not be forgotten that the SNP shamelessly followed the example of the UK Labour Government by cutting the winter fuel payment for thousands of pensioners this year, and this poor substitute is nothing but blatant spin that will fail to protect pensioners this year and in future winters.
My Scottish Conservative colleagues and I will continue to scrutinise the Scottish Government over this decision and stand up for Scottish pensioners who should not see their fuel payments cut this winter because of the SNP’s inept mismanagement of Scotland’s economy.
Proposed Speed Limit Changes
The SNP Government recently announced that it is consulting on proposals to lower the national speed limit on single carriageway roads from 60 mph to 50 mph, and to increase speed limits for good vehicles over 7.5 tonnes on single carriageways from 40 mph to 50 mph, and on dual carriageways from 50 mph to 60 mph.
While I welcome the proposed plan to change the speed limits for Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGV), if the SNP had kept their promises to upgrade and dual key roads, they wouldn't need to consider more limitations on drivers. The online consultation also does not separate the proposals for ordinary motorists and HGV drivers, and this will impact the results and could cause the conclusion to favour an all or nothing outcome.
The SNP are only trying to slow down drivers because they've been so slow to deliver vital infrastructure projects across Scotland. More restrictions are not what most people want to see and is another example of how detached the Scottish Parliament has become. If the SNP Government are genuinely interested in saving lives, they should be investing to improve roads up and down the country from the A9 to the A75, instead of imposing more curbs on motorists.
Reduction in the Active Travel Budget
The recent Scottish Budget for 2025-26 has cut the active and sustainable travel budget from £185.4 million to £164.8 million.
The Scottish Conservatives are concerned by this cut to the active and sustainable travel budget. Active travel is an essential part of Scotland’s transport landscape, but the SNP Government’s approach to active travel has been inconsistent.
While I recognise that cycling is an important part of Scotland’s transport landscape, pedestrians should be at the centre of Scotland’s approach to active travel and money should be diverted towards pedestrians and used for projects such as better pavements and more pedestrian crossings instead of, as is the case in some parts of Scotland, building cycle lanes leading to nowhere.
I would urge SNP Ministers to show some common sense, reconsider this cut, and ensure that pedestrians and all road users are put at the centre of active travel in Scotland.
The Scottish Budget and the Two-Child Cap
I believe that supporting families and helping parents into work requires a balanced system that provides support for those who need it, but that also ensures a sense of fairness to the taxpayer and many working families who do not see their incomes rise when they have more children. Moreover, recent statistics show that 78 per cent of families on Universal Credit had fewer than three children.
The SNP Government announced in its recent budget that it planned to mitigate the two-child cap, despite it being a reserved matter. It is not yet clear how this mechanism will work or how much it will cost. Furthermore, the Scottish Fiscal Commission was only sent the SNP’s plans just before the budget was announced and have warned that it is a ‘fiscal risk’ considering they did not have it cost it.
The Scottish Conservatives believe the two-child cap is necessary and the right approach at this time. The rapidly rising benefits bill is currently unsustainable as a direct consequence of the SNP’s high tax rates and mismanagement of our economy and public finances.
VAT on private school fees
I share your concerns about the new Labour Government’s insistence on applying VAT to private schools. I wrote about my concerns in my weekly columns in the Edinburgh Evening News in the run up to the election. You can read them here:
All very much to play for in Scotland - Sue Webber (scotsman.com)
School places will come under further pressure if Labour win - Sue Webber (scotsman.com)
I am disappointed that the new government have rushed into announcing their plans without taking into account the obvious and expert advice available, and that the council are not fully prepared for the consequences.
I will continue to raise this issue at every opportunity available to me.
Buffer zones around abortion clinics
Gillian Mackay’s private members Bill to introduce anti-protest or buffer zones around abortion clinics passed Stage 1 on 30th April 2024. I supported this Bill at this early stage
Abortion clinics are an essential legal medical service. No women should feel that they are being stigmatised against and discouraged from accessing abortion services.
As such, I will engage constructively with the Bill as it progresses through Parliament to enhance protections for women who are accessing these services. I am acutely aware how this will cause conflict with the right to protest and this fine balance must be carefully considered as the Bill progresses through parliament.
While I acknowledge that there is a right to protest, this must not come at the expense of women’s health and their right to access medical services free of prejudice.
Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act
Thank you for contacting me regarding the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021, which came into force on 1 April this year. Bigotry, racism and prejudice are unacceptable in a civilised society and hate crime is already unlawful. However, the SNP government's new legislation risks the right to freedom of expression and will potentially criminalise people for what they say in the privacy of their own homes. Most respondents to the Scottish Parliament justice committee’s public consultation on the legislation raised concerns.
The Scottish Police Federation stated the bill could ‘devastate’ the relationship between the police and the public. Furthermore, the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents believe that activists will abuse the hate crime laws and divert officers from serious crimes. The Scottish Newspaper Society have also said it ‘poses a serious threat to freedom of expression’ and the Faculty of Advocates said there was ‘no alternative but to reconsider the draft bill’.
Scottish Conservative amendments which would have protected free speech were voted down by the SNP and all other parties. As a result, we voted against the legislation as it threatens freed speech and fails to protect the right to privacy. For three years, the legislation was not enacted due to concerns about its impact on people and how it would be enforced. It still remains unclear how it will be policed and prosecuted with various groups warning about the impact on freedom of speech. SNP politicians continue to ignore widespread and credible concerns of academics, lawyers, journalists, entertainers and faith groups.
The Scottish Conservatives would repeal the SNP’s Hate Crime Act and replace it with a Protection of Free Speech Bill. We have an ongoing campaign which you can support on this issue: Scrap the SNP Hate Crime Act.
Short-term lets
The recent ruling by the Court of Session stated that the City of Edinburgh Council’s short-term lets licencing policy was unlawful.
I am growing increasingly concerned by the sheer complexity of the system, and the challenges being placed on small businesses across the area. Livelihoods are at risk.
This legal decision is another example of the Council failing to do their due diligence and a scheme which has faced problems from the outset.
On 1 October 2022, the law around short-term lets changed and now requires hosts to apply for a short-term let licence before they can accept bookings or receive guests. Although, the application deadline for existing operators has now been extended to October 2023.
When the final version of the licensing scheme was brought to Parliament only the Scottish Conservatives expressed concerns, and it is regrettable that this legislation was approved.
I support the right of homeowners and tenants to enjoy the use of their property, but I know that the SNP-Green Government’s policy will impact on self-catering businesses, as well as Airbnb and similar short-term let providers.
Tourism businesses across Scotland have been devastated by the pandemic and the last thing they need is to be burdened by more red tape. The Scottish Conservatives warned SNP-Green Ministers that the scheme was unworkable, but they failed to listen.
It is now time that SNP-Green Ministers suspended the short term lets legislation and consult again on a workable solution which would deliver the health and safety outcomes we all want to see.
Going forward, please be assured the Scottish Conservatives will continue to challenge the SNP-Green Government on this issue with the aim of ensuring that any changes to the law in this area are both necessary and proportionate.
Gender recognition reform Bill
The Scottish Conservatives recognise that improvements to the system of gender recognition would be beneficial for trans people. Now that the SNP Government have published their Bill we will constructively scrutinise proposals that may help to make the system and process easier.
However, as drafted, the proposals do not protect women’s rights and they do not offer enough protection for women’s safety. Women have raised legitimate and reasonable concerns about sections of this bill and it is essential that the SNP Government both listens to and addresses those concerns.
Improving the process for transgender people must not come at the expense of women’s rights and safety.
Thank you once again for taking the time to contact me on this issue.
Drug Consumption Rooms
The UK’s first official drug consumption room opened in Glasgow in January. The SNP Government claim that the service will reduce overdoses by providing a designated place for people to use drugs.
There is still a great deal of uncertainty surrounding the policing of the facility and communities will not be reassured by the lack of detail from the SNP Government.
While the SNP have realised the drug consumption room in Glasgow will not be a silver bullet it is deeply disappointing that the SNP are still refusing to support other measures to tackle this crisis. Furthermore, the effectiveness of this facility should be assessed before any more consumption rooms are proposed across Scotland.
The SNP shamefully took their eye off the ball and now drug deaths in Scotland are the highest in Europe.
It is time for the SNP Government to stop dithering and finally back the Right to Recovery Bill which is backed by experts and would guarantee a right to treatment for all those need it.